• Home
    • Area
    • Constitution
    • Management committee
  • The Forum
    • AGM 2017 notice
    • AGM 2018 notice
    • AGM 2019 report
  • Our plan
    • Neighbourhood Planning
    • Creating the Plan
    • Sept 2016 Plan submission
    • Final Consultation
    • Public examination
    • Earlier draft plans >
      • Draft policies - v.6
      • Draft policies - v.4
  • News & Views
    • News Blog
    • Archive
    • Station consultation
    • Send us your ideas
    • Survey results
  • Contact
Central Ealing Neighbourhood Forum

Forum comments on Perceval House plans

22/10/2020

0 Comments

 
 The Forum's Planning group has submitted a detailed objection to the Council's plan for the development of its headquarters building, Perceval House, and the adjoining car park.

The proposed plan is in breach of a number of the planning policies of the Neighbourhood Plan, which was adopted by the Council in 2017 after a 93% vote in favour in a local referendum. This local plan contains a detailed policy for the site, which the group says is breached by the proposals in several ways.

The points the Forum have noted include 
  • the bulk and massing of the scheme, in particular the 26-storey block at the north-east corner, would cause significant harm to the adjoining Conservation Area,  particularly the Grade II listed Town Hall.  It would also adversely  affect views from Walpole Park, and dominate nearby residential streets to the north
  • ​the detailed design of the replacement office block fronting Uxbridge Road is out of keeping with the neighbouring Town Hall, and the main tower block 
  • the new block would push the building frontage in front of the present building line and conflict with "boulevard" policy in the Council's own plans
  • provisions for servicing the new residential blocks are inadequate and potentially unsafe
  • there is insufficient amenity space for the new housing
  • present restrictions on access to Longfield Avenue from Uxbridge Road mean that more traffic will be directed through local residential streets, and no allowance has been made for the planned north-south cycle route.

In summary, the proposal is an over-development of a site which the London Plan recognises as a "sensitive location",  because of an increase in the number of flats well over the number in the original brief. The Forum considers that the benefits claimed for the scheme do not outweigh the substantial harm that it would cause.

"We have asked for a meeting with he Planning Officer concerned," says Tony Miller, CENF Chair, "but so far we have not been able to arrange one." A full copy of the letter can be seen here.  You can comment here.
(https://pam.ealing.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=makeCo. mment&keyVal=QFCTIOJM09L00)
0 Comments

COVID-19 news - and more

7/5/2020

1 Comment

 

Council goes on line
As we move cautiously towards relaxing lockdown, Ealing Council is restarting some of its meetings through the use of streaming as well as video conferencing.

The full Council meeting due on 5 May to elect next year’s Mayor has been postponed. However, some key committees are going online. Cabinet, Scrutiny, Planning Committee and Licensing Sub-committee will take place in May as scheduled, with the public able to watch. Links will be published on the Council web site with each agenda.

The Forum has welcomed this move as key to ensuring that, while face-to-face gatherings remain suspended, deliberations by the Council do not take place with little or no public scrutiny.

It is hoped that further committees will be streamed and recorded for U-tube. Where questions are normally permitted arrangements are being examined to allow public participation, by arrangement beforehand. If you want to take part, contact the relevant Committee clerk at 020 8825 7497.

Greenford tip can reopen – but when?
A Government instruction has been issued to councils to reopen waste disposal and recycling depots, and many have done so. Ealing has not responded to our question about when it will, but it’s clear that arrangements will have to be made to prevent long queues when they do. Don’t all rush!

News about testing – and more
A further edition of Ealing Covid-19 Newsletter with a range of news items about how Ealing is responding to the coronavirus has been published by Eric Leach, co-editor of West Ealing Neighbours, and can be seen here.

Warren Farm sale off
Ealing Council wants to withdraw from the Judicial Review into the Warren Farm sale, as QPR pulls the deal after finding a new training ground. Instead, the club has committed to helping develop the Ealing site for community sports use.
See 
https://www.qpr.co.uk/news/club-news/community-sports-facilities-commitment-for-warren-farm/

Tower block developments
A London School of Economics team is running a survey to better understand what Ealing residents think about tower blocks. Their invitation to participate says:

It is hard to find land in London to build on. One suggestion is to increase density - to allow more to be built on a piece of land. To this end, my colleagues and I at the London School of Economics have put together a survey to better understand what Outer London residents think about this.

The survey can be accessed by clicking on the link below and then, after having read the instructions, by clicking ‘Continue’. It consists of two parts. The first is a short questionnaire and the second contains a series of images for the participant to respond to. More detailed information, including a consent form, can be found on the survey’s introduction page. Participants are encouraged to complete the survey by May 31. Responses will be anonymous. If there are any technical questions or issues, please feel free to email: j.g.karlsson@lse.ac.uk.


Link to the survey: https://urban-experiment.com/share/jzx8JB. 

1 Comment

April 10th, 2020

10/4/2020

2 Comments

 
The Charity Commission has dealt a blow to Ealing Council’s hopes of completing their sale of the Town Hall to hotel developer Mastcraft, and improved the prospects of the Victoria Hall being preserved for public use as an independent charity.
PictureVictoria Hall seen from Dickens Yard
The Commission’s 13-page report says the council’s scheme could go ahead only if it is significantly modified.  Its Reviewer found that the lease was in effect a permanent disposal, and that no thought has been given to whether the proposals meet public needs as set out in the charity’s Trust Deed.

In short, the Scheme as drafted and the proposals negotiated by the Trustee for the future use of the Charity’s property "cannot be said to be a more suitable and effective use of the property than the original purposes and create a significant risk to the trust property".

​Details in the report set out a number of comments o the proposed scheme, and what would be needed to make it acceptable. These are set out below.
​

​Amongst objections to the proposals, the Reviewer noted that
  • no consideration has been given as to whether they are the best that can be obtained for the Charity
  • the trustee body consists entirely of members of the Council and is inherently conflicted
  • it would be the operator of the hotel who decides who can hire the facilities - not the Trustee
  • the categories entitled to use the Hall would potentially preclude some categories of local users
  • the Trustee has no realistic way of enforcing the covenant
  • the income from letting the Victoria Hall will go to the private company
  • a refurbished Victoria Hall may provide function room facilities appropriate to a boutique hotel but not necessarily be the most suitable type of venue for modern recreational and leisure time use.
 
In relation to the proposed land swap of the Queens Hall for the Princes Hall, the report noted that
  • there was no assessment of which of the Halls provides the type of facility and space that best meets the needs of the public for recreational and leisure time occupation
  • the Charity is potentially losing out in terms of the premium that it will receive as a result of the swap of Halls, which is being made for the Council’s convenience as a result of the deal it negotiated
  • there is disagreement on the extent of the Trust property. This is particularly important since the premium for the disposal of the Town Hall is to be apportioned between the Council and the Trust on the basis of floor area
  • the timing means that that the Charity will receive a reduced premium and rent from what it might have been entitled to if the swap had not taken place.
 
The reviewer concluded that, while there are grounds for agreeing that the Trustees could dispose of the property, the scheme as drafted is not a suitable and effective use of the charity’s property and would have to be revised if it is to proceed. Among the changes that would be needed are
  • consideration should be given to how the money earned from the deal would be distributed to the charity
  • benefits provided by the charity would have to be re-provided in the building or elsewhere
  • the council should be clear how it planned to use money earned from the sale of the hall to benefit the charity
  • the hotel operator is obliged to re-provide the current facilities
  • a plan to settle any conflicts of interest that might arise should be outlined. There needs to be an arrangement whereby there are independent co-optees to form a quorum where the elected councillors have, or may have, a conflict of interest.
2 Comments

Virus slows but doesn't stop central Ealing

30/3/2020

0 Comments

 

Coronavirus has brought most public activity in central Ealing to a standstill – but not quite all.
As well as non-essential shops, development sites have been closed. TfL and Crossrail have “temporarily suspended” work at all projects, unless they need to continue for safety reasons. Berkeley Group, owners of St George who are developing the Filmworks site, said it was “progressively managing the safe, temporary suspension of work" where they have been hit by supply issues. 

No-one yet knows what this will mean for completion of these key developments, which have already been long delayed. However some work continues behind closed doors.

Ealing Council says it will continue to process planning applications, with officers working from home.  A meeting of the Planning Committee has been cancelled, but it may be able to consider some proposals by internet contact. We expect that this means details of the Perceval House redevelopment will soon be lodged, as well as other changes which may prove significant, with potentially more being settled with little or no public scrutiny.

The Forum will continue to check all new information. Though we have stopped all face-to-face activities, we have been able to keep in touch through video conferencing. While it is unlikely that our June AGM can take place as scheduled, we will continue to keep people informed through our e-newsletter, Facebook and website.

Information and help
Ealing Council has joined forces with charities, local groups, businesses and concerned residents to respond to the COVID-19 crisis and has launched a new coalition called Ealing Together. Go to http://ealingtogether.org/ to offer to volunteer, give cash donations to local charities or support in other ways.

Residents can ask for help through a structured and trusted referral system for themselves, a vulnerable family or someone else they know who is isolated and struggling.
​

If you are in need of support and don’t have anyone close to you to help, call the advice line on 020 8825 7170.

0 Comments

Limit, educate, enforce to make streets safer

21/2/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
20mph limit to be trialled west of the A406 North Circular Road
 
The Council is to roll-out a 20mph speed limit across the whole of central Ealing
at the end of March this year, the Forum has learnt.
 
“A successful trial and review [in Acton] will see the speed limit expanded to residential
areas and town centres across the Borough by Spring 2019”,  Ealing Council Cabinet
said on 21st July 2015. The Acton 20mph limit was made permanent in Spring 2018.
 
We now hear that the Council is to implement a second trial 20mph limit area, to the west of A406 North Circular. In the south, Hounslow Council also plans a 20mph zone.
  
The Borough’s Transport Strategy, Local Implementation Plan and Cycle Plan all include a Borough-wide speed limit.  These plans were approved by the LBE Cabinet on 12th February.  
 
We asked the Council officers who wrote the report for some background on the implementation of 20mph west of A406 North Circular Road.   We have been told the next step should be the publication of the formal traffic order. If all goes to plan, this will come into effect on 31st March.  

0 Comments

Ealing Conservation Area wins national acclaim

23/10/2018

0 Comments

 
The Brentham Garden Estate has been recognised as one of the top ten Conservation Areas in England. This comes soon after Ealing Council passed plans to cut its Conservation Officer post, despite Neighbourhood Plan conservation policies adopted only last December.

In a national poll by Civic Voice, which represents 75,000 individual members in 275 civic groups, Brentham ranked number nine.  The vote was part of The Big Conservation Conversation to raise awareness about areas of historic interest and encourage communities to celebrate and protect those at risk.

The Central Ealing Neighbourhood Forum has congratulated Brentham on its success. Forum Chair Tony Miller said: “This underlines the importance of Conservation Areas to a thriving local community. Our CAs are among the features which give Ealing its special identity and a sense of place, making it an attractive area to live, work and visit.”

​Brentham has benefitted from conservation policies which have protected and enhanced its special style and spaces.  “This demonstrates the importance of having a specialist Conservation Officer to advise planners,” said Tony.   
Picture
0 Comments

Council approves new period for Forum

17/10/2018

0 Comments

 
Ealing Council Cabinet agreed at its meeting on Tuesday 16 October  to a five-year extension of the mandate for CENF, a year after the successful referendum on the Neighbourhood Plan. 

The report to Cabinet noted that a correctly prepared application and supporting documents had been received by the Council in  June  A public consultation was subsequently run for 6 weeks from 6 July to 17 August. A total of 23 responses were received, 21 of which supported the redesignation of the Forum for another 5-year period,  There were no objections.

Given the positive response to the consultation and the lack of any changes to the Forum boundary, which coincides with the adopted Central Ealing Neighbourhood Plan, it was recommended and Cabinet agreed to the redesignation of the Forum.

The Forum will now  concentrate on monitoring application of the Plan, and working to implement its projects, as agreed at the last open meeting (see previous blog).
0 Comments

Open Forum meeting agrees targets

17/10/2018

0 Comments

 
​Supporters had their say on implementing the Neighbourhood Plan at the Forum’s Open Meeting on 11 October. The discussion looked at what the Plan priorities are, who will carry the out, and how they will be paid for.

The Forum Chair, Tony Miller, said that the two main tasks were monitoring how the plan's policies were applied when new planning applications were made, and working to get our projects, called 'Recommended actions' in the Plan,  put  into effect.

The management committee is already looking at new planning applications as they are submitted. More importantly, we now have a chance of engaging developers in discussions before plans reach the stage of being formally submitted.  We 
Town Council. We aim to have talks with Galliford Try, Ealing's partners in the redevelopment of the Perceval House site, before they are  
too far advanced.

The meeting also looked at the list of projects (listed below), which we now aim to get included in the Council's list of infrastructure over the next five and more years.  While a few can hopefully be paid for from funds allocated from levies on 
development ,l other sources of finance will also have to be found. Options were the creation of a charitable trust fro some projects, and the creation of a Town Council with its own power to raise money. More work is to be done on these optio
ns.
Picture
0 Comments

Open Forum Meeting Thursday 11 October

7/10/2018

0 Comments

 

Making our town fit for 2026
A year ago, you – local residents and businesses– voted overwhelmingly for the Central Ealing Neighbourhood Plan created by the Forum
A year later, Ealing Council is about to renew the mandate of the Forum.
Its job will be to monitor delivery of the Plan.
How can it do this?
You can again have your say, at the Forum’s Open Meeting this week
on THURSDAY 11 OCTOBER
at EALING GREEN COLLEGE, W5 5EW
from 8 – 9:30 pm
The agenda is simple:
              WHAT are the Plan priorities?
              WHO will carry them out?
              HOW will they be paid for?
​All are welcome.

0 Comments

Ealing Broadway station delay poses ‘high risk’

4/9/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Any more delay with the rebuilding of Ealing Broadway station will pose unacceptable risks to the travelling public, Central Ealing Neighbourhood Forum has warned.

Tony Miller, Chair of the Forum, says that the threat of yet further hold-up on the station could even mean that Elizabeth Line services to Heathrow – now scheduled for December 2019 – will be running before vital work on passenger access is finished.

Ealing Council has already warned that improvements to the public area outside cannot be completed until after the building itself is ready.

“We have been saying for years that the present entrance is dangerous, particularly for the disabled, those with luggage or with children in buggies,” said Tony. “Since 2011, just before the picture [left] was taken showing the stairs to street level, the number of people passing through the sole entrance each year has risen by 700,000. Yet despite promises to accelerate the work, no improvement has been made to what even then was a risky and unacceptable situation.”
​

The excuse from Network Rail for the new delay to the start of services is that there is a need for more testing time. This is not relevant to building stations, continued Tony, as no new technology is involved.

“We cannot accept a continuation of the present situation, which presents a serious risk of injury or worse to passengers, for which Network Rail will be clearly responsible”, concluded Mr Miller. “We need an immediate clear, unequivocal and irreversible commitment from the very top to start work without more procrastination.”


0 Comments
<<Previous

    You - the author

    CENF is a partnership of local residents and businesses. It's open to everyone interested in the future of our town centre.  This is where you can let us have your ideas about how the town centre should develop.

    Archives

    October 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    June 2016
    May 2016
    June 2015
    August 2014
    January 2014
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013

    Categories

    All
    Arts & Culture
    A Vision For Ealing

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.